| Divisions Between Market and Reference Data Causing Issues For Transparency, says GoldenSource |
|
|
|
| Thursday, 11 June 2009 | ||
| Reference Data Review | ||
|
Divisions Between Market and Reference Data Causing Issues for Transparency, Says GoldenSource. A major hurdle to achieving a consistent view of pricing, positions and exposure lays in the divide between market data feeds and reference data repositories, according to GoldenSource, a provider of enterprise data management (EDM) solutions. A major hurdle to achieving a consistent view of pricing, positions and exposure lays in the divide between market data feeds and reference data repositories, according to GoldenSource, a provider of enterprise data management (EDM) solutions. "By definition, enterprise risk management and reporting should go front to back as well as across assets," says Gert Raeves, vice president of strategic business development at GoldenSource. Unprecedented market movements are impacting portfolios, customers, counterparties and issuers faster than ever, meaning back office risk and P&L systems can no longer wait until end of day to access critical market data. Regulators are expecting much of the same data used in the trading decision process to be extended to valuation, P&L and risk management, thus bringing the same issues around accuracy and consistency to both data areas. Regulatory and client demands for insight into how a value was derived means that golden copy pricing needs to extend beyond static reference sets and include multiple market data sources, says the vendor. Furthermore, siloed desks have traditionally been blamed for the inability to get a complete view of risk and exposure; these silos are now being broken down, yet the divide between market and reference data persists.
|